Then a mainstream British news dispensary dispenses this: "Keep an eye on the skies for saucers during the Olympic Games, warns former MoD UFO expert".
I was in total shock reading this because of how a) incredibly stupid so many aspects of this article are and b) that this is even getting media attention (well not that shocked).
A couple days ago I was watching the 2011 World weightlifting Championships and I saw something rather odd on the preamble, this:
 |
| Notice UFOs in the sky and 2012 Olympic logo in the center obscured by phone booth |
Nothing strange there right? Not unless you were privileged enough to hear Rik Clay speak before he mysteriously "commited suicide". He pointed out how there are strange aspects of the "2012" logo such as superfluous dots and funny looking mismatched twos.
 |
| Watch how easily this changes into.... |
 | ||
| ...this. |
"He said: 'It has been a widely held belief in Ministry of Defence circles that "aliens" have been able to detect us for decades via TV and radio broadcasts." Uh, that's news to me!
"On their arrival it is difficult to say what they would do: explore, help or destroy. Our resources make us quite a special threat." Well it actually seems like he has some pretty ideas on what they would do....
"If UFOs came into our atmosphere, RAF jets such as the Eurofighter Typhoons, and missiles such as the Rapiers guarding the Olympic Games would be well equipped to enter the fray."
"And if the aliens landed, in an unprecedented move, I am in doubt that the entire Army would be join the fight." This seems like misquote because he goes on to say...
"The TA and the Reserves would be called out and conscription potentially introduced."
Then this:
"Speaking about the cultural impact of aliens since the first widely-reported cases in the 1940s, he said: 'It is interesting to note that we are all in some ways equipped to deal with alien invasion - games such as Resistance: Burning Skies on PlayStation Vita help acclimatise people to the reality of extraterrestrial life - and in particular that they might be hostile.
'It is a widely held belief that classified information about weapons and tactics useful in combatting alien occupation are embedded into such gameplay."
A tangent: if the threat of having to fight aliens is "a widely held belief in Ministry of Defence circles" and that "It is a widely held belief that classified information about weapons and tactics useful in combatting alien occupation are embedded into such gameplay." then what does this say about other games? Namely Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 in which you play as a CIA operative killing hoards of unarmed civilians in an airport?
Or perhaps how later, in the same game, you play as a soldier "clearing houses" in an American suburb?
Wow, I knew this was some kind of psychological programming when I played it and was quite disturbed that I was alone in my observation but here we have a MoD insider telling us that this type of thing (implanting psychological programming into games) is going on. If the MoD is sure of this then we can bet that the DoD is doing it. Look at the logo of the publisher of Call of Duty:
 | ||
Back to the article:
"He added: 'Aliens may possess weapons or advanced technology we’ve no idea of. Aliens may have invisibility, a death ray, teleportation, force fields and other things we can't even guess at." Wow, this guy must be a genius (sarcasm). "Death rays" seriously? What is this? A joke? This is like Mars Attacks stuff. But he steps in it even more:
"Beyond this, unity is key, but as history dictates, this is not so easy.
'The logical course is to unite the world against the alien threat, combining our military strength and fighting under the United Nations. But some countries might not fight.
'We saw this type of treachery and cowardice in the Second World War. Though some brave people joined the Resistance, much of France accepted Nazi occupation."
Oh, looks like he's spilled the beans here: an obvious globalist agenda! We've been hearing this crap for years, this is why they started the "League of Nations" after WW1, globalism. What is wrong with globalism? Read "1984" or "A Brave New World" or watch "Brazil". There has been a globalist agenda on the table for over a century, in fact, doesn't popular belief hold that Hitler, wanting to dominate the whole planet, was a globalist? Isn't globalism the fevered wet dream of every dictator? How would this be any different?
Not to mention: fighting what is obviously a staged staged Alien invasion means that you are a treacherous coward? This sounds like a "hate speech" to me (he basically called most of the French "treacherous cowards", also to be clear I am mocking "hate speeches"). This guy is a one man propaganda machine! (I doubt very much that he is speaking for himself)
But speaking of 1984, a funny thing happened at the Los Angeles Olympics that year:
 |
| This photo is from the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics (!?) |
Maybe this "Alien threat" is why they decided to put all of those surface to air missile batteries on top of a shitload of London's buildings or why they have almost fifty thousand (50 000!!!) armed troops in London for the Olympics. Perhaps this has to do with the Rockefeller Foundation document "Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development" that predicts 13 000 dead at the London Olympics (written in 2010)? Maybe not...
...but what about these limey little faggots?
Jeez, don't those guys look kind of, well, alien-y? Why are these guys the mascots for the Olympics that has UFOs flying around in pre event hype? Even if the whole "alien invasion" bit, fake or otherwise, doesn't happen; isn't it still incredibly odd that there is an overt "Alien" theme at both the 1984 and 2012 Olympics and that we have this MoD patsy spouting off all of this fear mongering invasion stuff? To compound this strangeness there is this: Ronald Reagan talks about uniting the world because of some alien threat during an address to the UN. Not once, twice (well once it seems to be a White House press release) !!
I'm not going to get into the who is behind this because I don't know, there are lots of theories. Just think, who stands to benefit the most from a global government? Something tells me that it's bureaucrats. The "do nothing, take everything" crowd of politicians, bankers and bureaucrats. (funny, when you have tissue in your body that "does nothing, takes everything" it's called cancer)
To be clear about he whole "Zion" thing: there is a very good reason to believe that "Zion" is the global superstate (one world government). The reasons behind this this line of thinking are beyond the scope of this peice. The Olympics would be the "Road to Zion" because they would hypothetically be using it as a vehicle to sway popular opinion in favour of a global superstate by staging some catastrophe; one that apparently involves UFOs or Aliens in some capacity.
Just to finish this whole whole business off...
Does it not seem totally insane that Nick Pope and the British media (Pope, there's a red flag ;) says that jets and missiles are going to help combat the Alien menace but also says that we have no idea what kind of technology they will have and also that it will be superior? How do those sets of beliefs co-exist? I could probably go on and on and on about the contradictions and wacky weirdness involved in this whole business but I digress, I leave it to you to look at what is presented here and see what you can see for yourself.Whatever happens, if there is ANY call to fight, stay home. If everyone in pre WW2 Germany just stayed home the whole thing would have been averted. From the looks of this the whole thing is being staged, lookup Project Bluebeam, they've been working on this for decades. Just ask yourself, what would Gandhi do? : )
Thank you to redicecreations.com for their excellent news coverage, Rik Clay (RIP) and everyone else who has contributed to this story in one form or another.
